Difference Between Historical Cost vs. Fair Value

Valuation is a highly subjective matter. Valuation is the base for all the transactions, business analysis, and all mergers and acquisitions deals. Valuation may be at historical cost, fair value, notional value, intrinsic value, etc. The primary purpose of doing valuation is to identify the correct value of the asset for which deal or transaction is to be undertaken. It is not only helping sellers to determine the correct price for their commodity, but also this aids in reaching the level to identify that in which class of market the customer can be identified, and the deal can be settled.

In this article, we look at Historical Cost vs. Fair Value in detail –

What is Historical Cost?

Historical Cost means the actual price at which the transaction was done. All the commodity or assets present in the balance are needed to be disclosed at historical value. Historical cost is globally accepted as a measure to record the property plant and equipment. It will always show assets on a historical basis, which will be considered for calculating depreciation and for other statutory matters.

srcset=https://cdn.wallstreetmojo.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/Historical-Cost-vs-Fair-Value.jpg.webp

You are free to use this image on your website, templates etc, Please provide us with an attribution linkArticle Link to be Hyperlinked
For eg:
Source: Historical Cost vs Fair Value (wallstreetmojo.com)

What is Fair Value?

Fair value means the actual value of the asset in the market as on the day. Fair value is highly dependent on the demand, availability, perishability, market, set of assumptions, etc. Professionals are required to determine the fair value of any asset, commodity, or intangibles. Fair value is also known as intrinsic value, actuarial value, market price, etc.

Example of Historical Cost and Fair Value

Let’s understand the historical cost vs. fair value with an example

ABC Ltd acquires land at $100,000 in 2002.

  • The actual market price of that land in 2018 is around $1.75 million.
  • Here land will be reflected in the balance sheet at $100,000, which is nothing but historical value.

The market value of $1.75 million is considered the fair value of the asset.

Historical Cost vs. Fair Value Infographics

Here we provide you with the top 8 difference between Historical Cost vs. Fair Value.

width=500

You are free to use this image on your website, templates etc, Please provide us with an attribution linkArticle Link to be Hyperlinked
For eg:
Source: Historical Cost vs Fair Value (wallstreetmojo.com)

Historical Cost vs. Fair Value – Key Differences

The critical differences between Historical Cost vs. Fair Value are as follows –

Historical Cost vs. Fair Value Head to Head Difference

Let’s now look at the head to head difference between Historical Cost vs. Fair Value.

Basis – Historical Cost vs. Fair ValueHistorical CostFair Value
DefinitionHistorical Cost is the cost at which a transaction was done, or the asset was acquired.Fair value means the present market price that the asset can fetch.
Depreciation/ ImpairmentDepreciation is always getting calculated on the historical cost.Impairment is always calculated on a fair value basis.
Layman/ProfessionalThe layman can easily identify the historical cost as it is nothing but the transaction price.Professionals/Actuaries are needed to calculate fair value.
Items in the Balance sheetAs per Indian GAAP, Property, Plant, and Equipment are needed to be disclosed at historical cost in the balance sheet.As per Indian GAAP, Financial Instruments are needed to be disclosed at Fair value in the balance sheet.
Accounting StandardAS 16 requires historical cost based valuationAS 30,31 and 32, as well as IFRS 9, requires Fair Value based valuation.
CalculationThe historical cost calculation is easy and can be easily derived.Fair value calculation is highly complex.
AssumptionsHistorical Cost does not require any assumptions.Fair Value calculation requires various assumptions based on which fair value can be derived.
ComparabilityThe comparison is not possible under historical based valuation as various methods can have adopted for depreciation, inventory valuation Inventory Valuation Methods refers to the methodology (LIFO, FIFO, or a weighted average) used to value the companys inventories, which has an impact on the cost of goods sold as well as ending inventory, and thus has a financial impact on the companys bottom-line numbers and cash flow situation.read more, etc.The comparison is possible between 2 entities under the said method of valuationDiscounted cash flow, comparable company analysis, comparable transaction comps, asset valuation, and sum of parts are the five methods for valuing a company.read more as all the assets will be disclosed at fair value.

Final Thoughts

Valuation is at heart while discussing the business. The historical value will keep track of the value of the transaction at the time of the acquisition, while fair value shows the obtainable value of the same transaction as on date. Also, there are many approaches in calculating them and derive different valuation based on various assumptions. It is always challenging to choose the right method. Also, there will be a financial impact based on the method chosen.

This article has been a guide to Historical Cost vs. Fair Value. Here we discuss the top differences between Historical Cost vs. Fair Value along with infographics and comparison table. You may also have a look at the following articles –

Contact us

Find us at the office

Humble- Micallef street no. 52, 81559 Jakarta, Indonesia

Give us a ring

Arieal Keswick
+27 450 860 545
Mon - Fri, 9:00-18:00

Reach out